Solar Cells and Photonic Crystals

A place to discuss solar cells and photonic crystals, both in theory and experiment.

Thursday, May 25, 2006

gratings in 1D and 2D

After a short hiatus caused by the end of the semester, I'm back to blogging! And more specifically, back to discussing light trapping in solar cells.

One interesting issue that arises in designing diffraction light trapping is the choice of periodicity. In a 2D world, only one value must be chosen. It is set by the desired diffraction limit -- for a solar cell, this would generally correspond to the upper end of the absorption spectrum (where the greatest gains are possible). However, the real world is 3D, so one must choose two periods. The easiest choice is to have both be the same as in the 2D world. However, it's not necessarily the case that such a choice is the optimum or even really that close to optimum. Ideally, two sets of peaks would be created by the two gratings, and not overlap with each other. However, since the spacing is not constant, that's probably not realistic. So the 2D case will generally entail less than 100% enhancement compared to the 1D grating. Also, keep in mind that only 800-1100 nm is targeted for enhancement, so the second period must be at least 800/1100 = 73% of the smaller period. Right now, I'm looking into what relative periods are optimal, and how that's influenced by various factors such as the natural absorption length and material thickness. Hopefully I'll have some results on this idea soon!

56 Comments:

At 8:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://num.web.psi.ch/reports/2003/CMT/cmt-01-03-Morf-solar1.pdf

 
At 9:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://ao.osa.org/ViewMedia.cfm?id=45382&seq=0

 
At 9:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?id=82761

 
At 2:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just wondering what is different in your patent-pending technology from what has been done before (i.e. the first two publications above and references therein)?

 
At 2:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just curious about USC section 102(e) restrictions on getting a patent for a technology that was originally published in a US optics journal 11 years ago.

 
At 2:51 PM, Blogger Peter Bermel said...

I'd like to thank the anonymous poster for bringing our attention to some of the existing literature on light trapping in solar cells. I've seen the second Morf paper before but would like to look at the other two in more detail.

However, I don't understand why the anonymous poster has to imply that I'm somehow breaking some federal laws because there is some similarity between that work and mine. I did do a thorough literature search and I did include previous papers on prism designs as prior art in my patent filing. The key difference from the literature cited above is that instead of diffraction gratings, I used photonic crystals in my patent. Furthermore, it differs from the one existent US patent on photonic crystals in solar cells in several key ways, as well (in fact, I worked with the same lawyers as from that previous patent).

 
At 5:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Photonic crystals are diffraction gratings (1D or 2D).....you know that.

 
At 5:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The third post was to help you pick a proper unit cell for your photonic crystal/diffraction grating. While I am all for creating better devices and pushing science forward (I am doing my graduate research in photonic crystals/diffraction gratings/periodicty too and I am very familiar with your groups publications), I have issues with patents on generic ideas especially when created with public money (like your fellowship money). But I also understand the system too (as I am also a PhD student and I have been at the Grad school/Maxwell's Equation/photonic crystal game just as long as you have been...2001), and I understand that you are trying to take your area of study and turn it into a profitable venture. As for breaking laws....I don't think you are....I just think that the application might be questionable unless there is a lot more than just using periodicity (be it a single grating layer or stacked gratings) to enhance your diffraction into guided/leaky modes in your solar cell. Submitting a patent application is in no way breaking any law, its just a shame that stuff gets re-patented or sources get over looked so often in the patent application process. I know some examiners myself, and I know they are over-worked. So anyway, good luck on creating a better solar cell, I just hope the patent doesn't get granted, at least not until you are out of grad school and doing the research off the public dime and that it has major improvements over the prior art.

 
At 9:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I meant to send you this paper from the Sentenac group...

http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=APPLAB000086000012121105000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes

 
At 5:37 PM, Blogger Ziomal said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 5:23 PM, Blogger No Hassle Loans said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 9:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 8:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 10:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 4:02 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 12:52 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whoa, that's hardcore, brother! (and I can't be arsed to sign in so I'll be anonymous)

 
At 7:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 1:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 8:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 6:39 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 11:40 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 12:21 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 11:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 12:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 2:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 1:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 2:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 2:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 8:56 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 2:10 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 12:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 2:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great site, I am bookmarking it!Keep it up!
With the best regards!
David

 
At 8:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 6:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 9:31 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 4:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 5:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 10:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 4:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 8:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 2:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 7:18 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 10:02 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 4:15 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 5:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 7:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 5:53 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 1:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 10:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 4:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 2:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 5:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 9:05 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 11:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 1:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 10:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great site, I am bookmarking it!Keep it up!
With the best regards!
Frank

 

Post a Comment

<< Home